Hello Fabio,

On Oct 6, 7:10 pm, "Fabio Tonti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, that seems very sound. I'm very happy that there is something to do.
> In other words: I'm in (if I'm allowed to say this ;) ).

Well, everybody is welcome here ;)

>
> Of course, I need more information about it. So please mail me everything I
> need to know.

If you are familiar with IRC come into #sage-devel on freenode,
otherwise learn how to use it first. Development is encouraged to be
done in the open, i.e. the Google Groups or IRC, and it is much
quicker to ask in IRC compared to EMail. Mike will be able to give you
a quick overview what needs to be done, but an email like that should
go to the google groups so other people can give their point of view.
Many times that leads to a better end result because there are quite a
number of people around who have "good taste".

> Just one more question: is there a time limit for such projects? (I'll try
> to work as fast as I can, but I don't know how it compares to other
> developers since it's the first project I'm directly involved with) I hope
> this question won't make a bad impression.

There is no time limit, just the danger that somebody else might fix
the problem before you do. Best is to do small steps at the beginning
and have those merged in quickly. I am sure Mike will give you a hand
and give you feedback along the way. And there are more than enough
problems for all to have something to do. If you get bored just look
at the trac installation and pick out something interesting.

> Thanks again.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Fabio
>

Cheers,

Michael

> On 10/6/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 10/6/07, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm not sure whether it would be better (for me) to work on the
> > > openmath-stuff David proposed or whether I should engage with
> > combinatorics
> > > (Mike Hansen). I must say that I'm definitely interested in the
> > > combinatorics implementation; I'm not at all familiar with tcl/tk. Of
> > > course, I could always do some documenting work. And I'm also not sure
> > about
> > > the substitution of subexpressions concerning SymPy, I would need some
> > > information on that. Still, combinatorics sounds very good. So... What
> > do
> > > you propose?
>
> > I think combinatorics would be best for you, since it will involve
> > the most interesting mathematics, and you're already interested
> > in it, and there's a lot of momentum there right now with what
> > Mike is doing.
>
> > William


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to