On 2013-07-13, Darij Grinberg <darijgrinb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dima,
>
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> IMHO it's a not as obsolete convention as you seem to imply; isn't e.g. Magma
>> using the same convention as GAP?
>> Not mentioning a lot of group theory literature...
>
> I don't know anything about Magma, but what group theory literature
> uses this convention?
IMHO, most of what is written by the UK (and even the British Commonwealth) 
mathematicians, e.g. the Altas of Finite Groups by J.Conway et al.

Dima

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to