Hi Dima, On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMHO it's a not as obsolete convention as you seem to imply; isn't e.g. Magma > using the same convention as GAP? > Not mentioning a lot of group theory literature...
I don't know anything about Magma, but what group theory literature uses this convention? Best regards, Darij -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
