Honestly guys, nobody ever spoke of police and judges and jury...
Thierry, sorry to have misused your name. At some point, you had some concerns about a list of 12 guys taking all the decisions and that's what raised my own concern about the the mailing list (sorry for the short-cut). Cheers Viviane 2014-11-25 17:34 GMT+01:00 Nathann Cohen <[email protected]>: > Here is an additional way to preserve the community spirit: > > After their discussion on sage-abuse, the administrators will reach a > verdict. I assume that the judges will be carefully selected among the > members of the community, yet their verdict will be pronounced on behalf of > the community. Hence, we could do like for this very code: the verdict > reached by the members of the jury could be presented to the community, and > people would vote Yes/No to apply it. > > This way the decision would be taken by the community again, even though > the wording (like for this code) and the choice of the sentence would only > be the one of a reduced set of persons. > > Nathann > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
