Hi, On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:04:28PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote: > Hi! > > >Does anyone have another suggestion for this? > > William had posted this at some point in the long thread: > > "Since I attempted to retract this proposal in light of Volker's > sensible criticism, and people keep responding as if I didn't, let me > officially retract this proposal. > > Instead I support what I think Volker suggested, which is using our > existing completely open voting process on sage-devel, as we have been > doing for years, for sage-abuse issues. But to make it clear that we > care about sage-abuse issues and make clear the existence of > sage-flame."
I could not find Volker's statement on the public mailing-list, could you please provide a link ? Ciao, Thierry > This would mean it is a community decision and discussion and not done > by group of select people. > > Best, > > Anne > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
