I strongly object to removing the function to_partition as it is useful to people (beyond FindStat), but I'm not opposed to renaming it to something like connected_components_partition. Similar for to_graph. Although if you want to argue about removing "one-line" functions, we should also remove add_edges, add_vertices, delete_edges, delete_vertices, subdivide_edges, average_degree, average_distance, etc. Also I cannot emphasize sufficiently that not all Sage users who use the graph code are graph theorists.
Travis On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 2:12:07 AM UTC-8, vdelecroix wrote: > > Hello, > > For Graph I would remove the one line functions > > - remove Graph.to_partition > - remove Graph.connected_components_number > > or as a second choice > > - rename Graph.to_partition -> Graph.connected_components_sizes (with > an argument `multiplicity` if you need to emphasize that you will > repeat the numbers several time) > > Vincent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
