At least the ones you mention are in #17278 which will be in rc2

On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 1:16:43 PM UTC, John Cremona wrote:
>
> It's a long time since I have done a "make ptestlong" and not had 
> several test failures.  I have done "make distclean" first and have 
> pulled the latest develop branch (commit 
> 8b95db32005c62e289d6698e8233218d5fda0f60) but see this: 
>
> sage -t --long src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx  # 1 doctest failed 
> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py  # 1 
> doctest failed 
> sage -t --long src/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx  # 1 doctest 
> failed 
> sage -t --long src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py  # Timed out 
>
> where I think the first three are the usual suspects (for me).  The 
> last one was ok on a retry.  The others are 
>
> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 87, in 
> sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense. 
> Matrix_double_dense 
> Failed example: 
>     m^(-1) 
> Expected: 
>     [-1.9999999999999996  0.9999999999999998] 
>     [ 1.4999999999999998 -0.4999999999999999] 
> Got: 
>     [-2.0  1.0] 
>     [ 1.5 -0.5] 
>
> File "src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py", line 51, in 
> sage.tests.french_book.li 
> nsolve_doctest 
> Failed example: 
>     x = A\b; x  # rel tol 1e-15 
> Expected: 
>     (-0.20000000000000018, 0.9000000000000001) 
> Got: 
>     (-0.19999999999999987, 0.8999999999999999) 
> Tolerance exceeded in 1 of 2: 
>     -0.20000000000000018 vs -0.19999999999999987, tolerance 2e-15 > 1e-15 
>
> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx", line 61, in 
> sage.matrix.matrix_real_dou 
> ble_dense.Matrix_real_double_dense 
> Failed example: 
>     n = m^(-1); n 
> Expected: 
>     [-1.9999999999999996  0.9999999999999998] 
>     [ 1.4999999999999998 -0.4999999999999999] 
> Got: 
>     [-2.0  1.0] 
>     [ 1.5 -0.5] 
>
> which I am sure have been mentioned before, but I also thought they 
> had been fixed? 
>
> John 
>
> On 4 November 2014 10:54, Volker Braun <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 8:49:10 AM UTC, leif wrote: 
> >> 
> >> Well, if a (potential) argument follows '-n' 
> > 
> > 
> > Its not a hand-written parser, duh. Also, that is not how command line 
> tools 
> > work. 
> > 
> >> 
> >> > On the plus side the error that you'll get is pretty 
> self-explanatory. 
> >> CRITICAL:root:unknown, 
> > 
> > 
> > Which part of the bog-standard Python logging is hard to understand? 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "sage-release" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>. 
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to