On 4 November 2014 13:56, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > At least the ones you mention are in #17278 which will be in rc2
Good! looking forward to it. John > > > On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 1:16:43 PM UTC, John Cremona wrote: >> >> It's a long time since I have done a "make ptestlong" and not had >> several test failures. I have done "make distclean" first and have >> pulled the latest develop branch (commit >> 8b95db32005c62e289d6698e8233218d5fda0f60) but see this: >> >> sage -t --long src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx # 1 doctest failed >> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py # 1 >> doctest failed >> sage -t --long src/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx # 1 doctest >> failed >> sage -t --long src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py # Timed out >> >> where I think the first three are the usual suspects (for me). The >> last one was ok on a retry. The others are >> >> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 87, in >> sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense. >> Matrix_double_dense >> Failed example: >> m^(-1) >> Expected: >> [-1.9999999999999996 0.9999999999999998] >> [ 1.4999999999999998 -0.4999999999999999] >> Got: >> [-2.0 1.0] >> [ 1.5 -0.5] >> >> File "src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py", line 51, in >> sage.tests.french_book.li >> nsolve_doctest >> Failed example: >> x = A\b; x # rel tol 1e-15 >> Expected: >> (-0.20000000000000018, 0.9000000000000001) >> Got: >> (-0.19999999999999987, 0.8999999999999999) >> Tolerance exceeded in 1 of 2: >> -0.20000000000000018 vs -0.19999999999999987, tolerance 2e-15 > 1e-15 >> >> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx", line 61, in >> sage.matrix.matrix_real_dou >> ble_dense.Matrix_real_double_dense >> Failed example: >> n = m^(-1); n >> Expected: >> [-1.9999999999999996 0.9999999999999998] >> [ 1.4999999999999998 -0.4999999999999999] >> Got: >> [-2.0 1.0] >> [ 1.5 -0.5] >> >> which I am sure have been mentioned before, but I also thought they >> had been fixed? >> >> John >> >> On 4 November 2014 10:54, Volker Braun <vbrau...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 8:49:10 AM UTC, leif wrote: >> >> >> >> Well, if a (potential) argument follows '-n' >> > >> > >> > Its not a hand-written parser, duh. Also, that is not how command line >> > tools >> > work. >> > >> >> >> >> > On the plus side the error that you'll get is pretty >> >> > self-explanatory. >> >> CRITICAL:root:unknown, >> > >> > >> > Which part of the bog-standard Python logging is hard to understand? >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "sage-release" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> > an >> > email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com. >> > To post to this group, send email to sage-r...@googlegroups.com. >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
