On 4 November 2014 15:42, Volker Braun <[email protected]> wrote:
> Do you get any failures with #17278?
>
2 pass, 1 still fails:
File "src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py", line 51, in
sage.tests.french_book.linsolve_doctest
Failed example:
x = A\b; x # rel tol 1e-15
Expected:
(-0.20000000000000018, 0.9000000000000001)
Got:
(-0.19999999999999987, 0.8999999999999999)
Tolerance exceeded in 1 of 2:
-0.20000000000000018 vs -0.19999999999999987, tolerance 2e-15 > 1e-15
John
>
> On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 1:58:34 PM UTC, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 2:16:43 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>>>
>>> It's a long time since I have done a "make ptestlong" and not had
>>> several test failures. I have done "make distclean" first and have
>>> pulled the latest develop branch (commit
>>> 8b95db32005c62e289d6698e8233218d5fda0f60) but see this:
>>>
>>> sage -t --long src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx # 1 doctest
>>> failed
>>> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py # 1
>>> doctest failed
>>> sage -t --long src/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx # 1 doctest
>>> failed
>>> sage -t --long src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py # Timed out
>>>
>>> where I think the first three are the usual suspects (for me). The
>>> last one was ok on a retry. The others are
>>>
>>> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 87, in
>>> sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense.
>>> Matrix_double_dense
>>> Failed example:
>>> m^(-1)
>>> Expected:
>>> [-1.9999999999999996 0.9999999999999998]
>>> [ 1.4999999999999998 -0.4999999999999999]
>>> Got:
>>> [-2.0 1.0]
>>> [ 1.5 -0.5]
>>>
>>> File "src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py", line 51, in
>>> sage.tests.french_book.li
>>> nsolve_doctest
>>> Failed example:
>>> x = A\b; x # rel tol 1e-15
>>> Expected:
>>> (-0.20000000000000018, 0.9000000000000001)
>>> Got:
>>> (-0.19999999999999987, 0.8999999999999999)
>>> Tolerance exceeded in 1 of 2:
>>> -0.20000000000000018 vs -0.19999999999999987, tolerance 2e-15 > 1e-15
>>>
>>> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx", line 61, in
>>> sage.matrix.matrix_real_dou
>>> ble_dense.Matrix_real_double_dense
>>> Failed example:
>>> n = m^(-1); n
>>> Expected:
>>> [-1.9999999999999996 0.9999999999999998]
>>> [ 1.4999999999999998 -0.4999999999999999]
>>> Got:
>>> [-2.0 1.0]
>>> [ 1.5 -0.5]
>>>
>>> which I am sure have been mentioned before, but I also thought they
>>> had been fixed?
>>>
>> Were this specific ones mentonied?
>> I know some were fixed in #17063, some in #17126, some in #17238 ...
>> And with all of these merged, everything was fine with 6.4..rc0, but now I
>> get new failing ones with 6.4.rc1 :)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
