Do you get any failures with #17278?

On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 1:58:34 PM UTC, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 4, 2014 2:16:43 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> It's a long time since I have done a "make ptestlong" and not had 
>> several test failures.  I have done "make distclean" first and have 
>> pulled the latest develop branch (commit 
>> 8b95db32005c62e289d6698e8233218d5fda0f60) but see this: 
>>
>> sage -t --long src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx  # 1 doctest 
>> failed 
>> sage -t --long src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py  # 1 
>> doctest failed 
>> sage -t --long src/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx  # 1 doctest 
>> failed 
>> sage -t --long src/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py  # Timed out 
>>
>> where I think the first three are the usual suspects (for me).  The 
>> last one was ok on a retry.  The others are 
>>
>> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 87, in 
>> sage.matrix.matrix_double_dense. 
>> Matrix_double_dense 
>> Failed example: 
>>     m^(-1) 
>> Expected: 
>>     [-1.9999999999999996  0.9999999999999998] 
>>     [ 1.4999999999999998 -0.4999999999999999] 
>> Got: 
>>     [-2.0  1.0] 
>>     [ 1.5 -0.5] 
>>
>> File "src/sage/tests/french_book/linsolve_doctest.py", line 51, in 
>> sage.tests.french_book.li 
>> nsolve_doctest 
>> Failed example: 
>>     x = A\b; x  # rel tol 1e-15 
>> Expected: 
>>     (-0.20000000000000018, 0.9000000000000001) 
>> Got: 
>>     (-0.19999999999999987, 0.8999999999999999) 
>> Tolerance exceeded in 1 of 2: 
>>     -0.20000000000000018 vs -0.19999999999999987, tolerance 2e-15 > 1e-15 
>>
>> File "src/sage/matrix/matrix_real_double_dense.pyx", line 61, in 
>> sage.matrix.matrix_real_dou 
>> ble_dense.Matrix_real_double_dense 
>> Failed example: 
>>     n = m^(-1); n 
>> Expected: 
>>     [-1.9999999999999996  0.9999999999999998] 
>>     [ 1.4999999999999998 -0.4999999999999999] 
>> Got: 
>>     [-2.0  1.0] 
>>     [ 1.5 -0.5] 
>>
>> which I am sure have been mentioned before, but I also thought they 
>> had been fixed? 
>>
>> Were this specific ones mentonied?
> I know some were fixed in #17063, some in #17126, some in #17238 ...
> And with all of these merged, everything was fine with 6.4..rc0, but now I 
> get new failing ones with 6.4.rc1 :)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to