As far as I am concerned, Ubuntu 16.04 is past its EOL. We should not support it, and it will save us time messing around with obsolete compilers too (the last release in gcc 5 branch was 4 years ago, and gcc does not support anything older than gcc 9 now).
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 7:22 PM Simon King <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > On 2021-08-30, Matthias Köppe <[email protected]> wrote: > > ./configure correctly determines that it needs to use CXX='g++ > > -std=gnu++11' to work with this old compiler. > > Check if you have environment variables CC or CXX set in your global > > environment -- they should be unset; otherwise, they will override the > > values determined by ./configure. (This is nonstandard behavior of our > > build system.) > > In a shell: > king@klap:~/Sage/git/sage$ echo $CC > > king@klap:~/Sage/git/sage$ echo $CXX > > So, it is not set. > In a Sage shell: > (sage-sh) king@klap:sage$ echo $CC > gcc > (sage-sh) king@klap:sage$ echo $CXX > g++ -std=gnu++11 > > This is what it should be, right? > > Best regards, > Simon > > > > On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 3:04:34 PM UTC-7 Simon King wrote: > > > >> Hi Matthias, > >> > >> the two logs are at https://users.fmi.uni-jena.de/~king/logs/ > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Simon > >> > >> On 2021-08-29, Matthias Köppe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Singular vendors a part of gfan called gfanlib. Perhaps an installation > >> of > >> > that is leaking into your build. > >> > > >> > If you can share your top-level config.log and the full gfan build log, > >> we > >> > can take a closer look. > >> > > >> > On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 11:50:32 AM UTC-7 Simon King wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Matthias, > >> >> > >> >> On 2021-08-29, Matthias Köppe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 5:44:33 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> is gfan partially taken from the system? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> probably. Ubuntu 16.04 has gfan version 0.5, but Sage needs 0.6.2. > >> >> >> A system-wide install of old gfan might get in the way. > >> >> > > >> >> > No, that alone cannot explain it -- we test this configuration. > >> >> > ubuntu-xenial-standard installs the system gfan, then rejects it, > >> then > >> >> > correctly builds gfan. > >> >> > >> >> What could explain it? Is there a typical application that I might have > >> >> installed and depends on gfan? I mean, it is for Groebner fans. So, what > >> >> *non-mathematical* software would use it? I don't think that I installed > >> >> a mathematical software after the last successful build of Sage. > >> >> > >> >> Should I try to uninstall gfan, re-install it, and try again? And, > >> >> if that fails, uninstall and NOT re-install, but build Sage and hope > >> >> that it provides a working gfan? > >> >> > >> >> Best regards, > >> >> Simon > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "sage-release" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-release/WX3m7T8-SeM/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/sgj7jp%247b6%241%40ciao.gmane.io. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/CAAWYfq1mC6ANDhNWFnoLprYUeMZakKqW3rh52NMGQz-bkSKjWg%40mail.gmail.com.
