+1 for a 'smart' auto backup system. I don't know whether it was the 
snapshot saving or what did it, but I never bothered saving notebooks 
while working with them and never lost any data after crashes. It is 
such a great peace of mind not to have to remember to save your work 
regularly and still not to risk any data loss. This was an experience I 
have never had with any other software before.

For some reason, I was thinking that the auto save in sage works 
incrementally, like for example in svn. The problem of identical 
snapshots suggests otherwise. Am I confusing something here?

Cheers,
Stan

Rob Beezer wrote:
> On Apr 22, 5:36 pm, William Stein <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> Does anybody here ever use snapshots?
>>     
>
> I have never used a snapshot, that I am aware of.  I've lost a cell or
> two due to crashes, but I think this was always due to my flaky USB
> hard drive setup and not Sage's fault.  And it was always just messing
> around while writing lecture notes, or something similarly not too
> important.
>
> I like the way the proposed patch wipes the slate fairly clean.  But I
> sort of hope it is temporary and at some point a rational autosave
> strategy of some sort is implemented.    There was an attempt to not
> create a snapshot if there were no changes, but I don't think that
> worked as advertised.  And the auto-save interval was more like "save
> if there is a trigger and it has been *longer* than the interval"
>
> It would be nice if
>
> (a) autosave, or not, was user-configurable from the notebook settings
> by user
>
> (b) autosave interval could be set to *any* integer number of seconds/
> minutes (maybe 0 means don't) in notebook settings
>
> (c) There really weren't ever identical snapshots created
>
> (d) William's idea of phased snapshots (fewer as they age) was
> implemented since it is a good idea.
>
> Is it problematic to spawn a thread that just sleeps for an interval
> and then wakes up to consider making a snapshot?
>
> Anyway, this isn't meant to be a proposal, just the suggestion that if
> properly designed, then a useful, unobtrusive backup system should be
> possible.
>
> I hope to review William's patch soon, but will let this thread run
> its course first.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
> >
>   

-- 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to