On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:15 AM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 9:32 PM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 14 March 2024 21:09:22 GMT, Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote: >> >I get the impression that without setting ymin,ymax you just end up with >> a >> >tiny range for the y-axis and its labelling is just very weird. I think >> the >> >labels displayed are shifted and scaled. So the error is just how the >> >labels are printed. That looks the same as >> >https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/34233 >> > >> >> Good catch! So it seems indeed the same story, just on the microscale. >> With the patch from #34233 I get essentially the same graph, but with extra >> 10^-9 >> or something like this printed above the graph. >> So when x is very close to 0 one indeed sees this "sharp" drop, by 10^9 >> or something... >> >> >The default behaviour would be to derive ymin and ymax from the sampled >> >points, and in your point plot example, those values vary from 1-1e-6 to >> >1+0e-6. So I think the range is derived appropriately. The labels on the >> >y-axis are just printed in a misguided way. >> > > Attached in the plot with x in [-0.1,0.1] - and it is actually OK, I think > the minimum (with x=0) is where it should be, at 0.9999990... > I meant 0.9999990 x 10^-6, as indicated on the label. It's a bit confusing that the y-axis is labelled this way, but the offset > of +1 is indicated at the > label above. > > Dima > > >> > >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-support/CAAWYfq2qWATF3Jkx_RjvF_BeK1tOD_ge3kUV7eNFtTtm8oK8qg%40mail.gmail.com.
