#13447: Make libsingular multivariate polynomial rings collectable
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Reporter: nbruin |
Owner:
Type: defect |
Status: needs_work
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: memleak |
Resolution:
Keywords: | Work
issues: Understand why sometimes `new_RingWrap` needs an incref and sometimes
not
Report Upstream: None of the above - read trac for reasoning. |
Reviewers: Simon King
Authors: Nils Bruin, Simon King | Merged
in:
Dependencies: #11521 |
Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Comment (by SimonKing):
By the way, has anyone preserved an old version of [attachment:]? It used
to work well, although Nils had some objections.
Here is the result of the test suite:
{{{
sage -t -force_lib
devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py # Time out
sage -t -force_lib devel/sage/doc/de/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst #
Time out
sage -t -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst #
Time out
sage -t -force_lib devel/sage/doc/fr/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst #
Time out
sage -t -force_lib devel/sage/doc/ru/tutorial/tour_advanced.rst #
Time out
sage -t -force_lib devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx # 5
doctests failed
sage -t -force_lib
devel/sage/sage/schemes/generic/algebraic_scheme.py # Time out
}}}
Looks like a lot of work. Fortunately, the errors in function.pyx seem to
be a bit more "expressive" than the timeouts.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13447#comment:81>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
