#13072: Implementation of PartitionTuple + some minor fixes to partition.py
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: andrew.mathas | Owner: Andrew Mathas
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: tuples of partitions | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Andrew Mathas | Merged in:
Dependencies: #9265, #11446 | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Florent,
Thank you for catching these docstring problems. I appreciate you begin
picky about the docs. I didn't know about the indentation of the bullet
lists, and I did miss that indentation of EXAMPLES:: block in the compiled
doc.
Andrew,
A few more minor issues.
- I believe this line (line 263 in `partition_tuple.py`) has a comma
misplaced:
{{{
When these algebras are not semisimple partition, tuples index...
}}}
- In `partition_tuple.hook_length()` it should be {{{coordinates of the
form `(k,r,c)`}}}
- In `partition.random_element()`, the inputs `uniform` and `Plancherel`
should be indented one more since they are the types of inputs for
`measure`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13072#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
