#12518: Enumerated set from iterator
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner: vdelecroix
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: set, iterator | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: PatchBot
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Merged in:
Dependencies: #12653 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Hey Vincent,
> > I also get the patchbot errors when running the patch in the combinat
queue on 5.5.rc0. Also from a quick look-through the patch, there are a
few things which I believe needs to be addressed:
> > - Documentation and tests for the deprecated functions in
`combinat/combinat.py`
>
> These functions were *only* in the sage-combinat queues and not inside
Sage. So the deprecation is just intended for people from combinat who
were using it (and I think that none of them uses it).
Since these functions are not in sage, its probably best to remove these
functions from this patch and then put a second patch in the combinat
queue deprecating these functions.
> > - I prefer to see the reserved words in code blocks: {{{``None``}}},
{{{``self``}}}, {{{``True``}}}, and {{{``False``}}}
>
> Is there a difference for documentation ? I thought that code blocks
open a new paragraph.
I should have called it (inline) code format, and it just changes the
format in the output html.
Thanks,[[BR]]
Travis
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12518#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.