#5453: [with patch, needs review] Create a ring for working with polynomials in
countably infinitely many variables
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: mhansen | Owner: mhansen
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.4.2
Component: commutative algebra | Keywords:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:24 malb]:
> At least some agreement on the name should be reached.
I sketched my opinion already:
* If the aim is an implementation of the algorithm of Aschenbrenner and
Hillar, we should use the word ``Symmetric``, since they do.
* If it is just about having a convenient way to provide an unbounded
number of variables, than ``InfinitePolynomialRing`` is fine as well.
* Since i think that the most ambitious part of the implementation is in
fact the Gröbner basis computation, I vote for 'Symmetric'.
But what do you think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5453#comment:25>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
