#12205: rewrite conway polynomial spkg and code in Sage library to not use ZODB
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: was
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: databases | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by fbissey):
I think we have to stick with the dictionary format since the code in sage
is littered with calls to !ConwayPolynomials()[p][n] and changing the
storage would imply changing an enormous amount of code. I trust that your
python foo is way ahead of mine. I would never have produced that getitem
and didn't find any examples to do that with google. Your patch is longer
than my current one but probably better behaved in the long run. It is
very educative to me too.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12205#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
