#12205: rewrite conway polynomial spkg and code in Sage library to not use ZODB
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: was
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: databases | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by rohana):
Replying to [comment:26 fbissey]:
> Any reason you changed "[]" to "()" in the polynomial method doctest? It
wasn't in the previous patch and I would hope that if it is correct it
doesn't lead to other breakages in the rest of sage.
I updated the database to use tuples (updated the spkg), rather than
lists, as they are not mutable. I don't believe there are other breakages,
but I haven't run the full doctest suit (just a few files I found through
greping).
Replying to [comment:27 nbruin]:
> Perhaps store the database in a module-level variable then?
Yes, that sounds like a plan.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12205#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
