#12205: rewrite conway polynomial spkg and code in Sage library to not use ZODB
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: was
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: databases | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Comment (by fbissey):
@SimonKing: overall you read my terrible prose correctly. I read the patch
carefuly and in spite of call changes in the class I understood that the
old way of accessing the class was preserved. You make a good point that
it doesn't need to be preserved internally - just that we provide the
right method of access.
I used to have a copy of "dive into python" wonder what happened to it.
Probably lost last time I moved. I would say I read the python
documentation but my python skill are not advanced enough that I could
have crafted a getitem accessing something like [p][n] - [p,n] is easy the
former is more tricky to me.
@rohana: going with plain text would remove the requirement of installing
sage before this spkg. As it is sage needs to be installed first to
produce the sobj. The spkg could then be installed at any time.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12205#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
