#6743: cygwin metaticket: port Sage to Microsoft Windows (via Cygwin): stage 1
--
make building Sage automatic
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.9
Component: porting: Cygwin | Resolution:
Keywords: sd31 sd32 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Jean-Pierre Flori, Dmitrii
Pasechnik, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Mike Hansen, William Stein, Luis Tabera
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: #14406 | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* dependencies: => #14406
Comment:
> > Here is the current status for this ticket, then, in my view.
> > * Patch to remove `SAGE_PORT=yes` requirement for Cygwin.
> Still needed.
This is #14406, probably will be included soon.
> > * Related to that, we still get the message about `sqrtl in -lm`
outdated math library, which presumably would make things fail if
`SAGE_PORT` wasn't set, so we need to somehow fix things so that's not an
issue. What happens on FreeBSD?
> Any updates with what we should do here? The code for the sqrtl
business that David wrote is a little convoluted for me, but perhaps it
wouldn't be that hard to change to logl as was suggested above.
Also #14406.
> > * As Jeroen points out, make sure that we put something in so that we
don't use the (current) Sage 4.6 GCC spkg to build on Cygwin. This could
involve making the 4.7.2 spkg standard (I don't believe there is a ticket
for this yet, though there is a sage-devel thread reporting a fair amount
of success), or something else.
> This is #14378, and Jeroen even has an spkg.
And it's been closed.
----
> > * Figure out whether mpfr-4 needs to be installed or not. I now have
two different brand-new installs of Cygwin that failed with the current
package list until I installed it. It was ''not'' pulled in with gcc-core
and friends.
> Looks like it's needed for now, or is there any action on the Cygwin
front?
So the sole remaining issue ''for this ticket'' is the check for mpfr-4.
What should we do about this?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743#comment:244>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
