#15071: Make it easy to have automatic numerical evaluation of symbolic
functions
on inexact input
---------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: eviatarbach | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: symbolics | Keywords:
Merged in: | Authors:
Reviewers: | Report Upstream: N/A
Work issues: | Branch:
Commit: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
---------------------------+-----------------------------
This ticket is for making it easy to have symbolic functions automatically
evaluate on inexact input. This is already the behaviour of most symbolic
functions and as such it would be good to have a standard way of
implementing it.
This ticket modifies `Function._eval_default` to accept an arbitrary
number of arguments. To have the numeric evaluation work, `_eval_default`
can be assigned to `_eval_`, or it can be called from within `_eval_` and,
if it returns `None`, leaves opportunity for exact simplification. For
example,
{{{
sage: from sage.symbolic.function import BuiltinFunction
sage: class Test(BuiltinFunction):
....: def __init__(self):
....: BuiltinFunction.__init__(self, 'test', nargs=1)
....: def _evalf_(self, x, parent):
....: return 0.5
....: def _eval_(self, x):
....: y = self._eval_default(x)
....: if y:
....: return y
....: else:
....: return 3
sage: test = Test()
sage: test(1.3)
0.500000000000000
sage: test(pi)
3
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15071>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
