#15071: Make it easy to have automatic numerical evaluation of symbolic
functions
on inexact input
-------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: eviatarbach | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.12
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by eviatarbach):
Benjamin, I CC'ed you since it appears like you implemented this for many
symbolic functions. What do you think of this approach?
The reason why I added `AttributeError` to the `except` in `test_relation`
is because this is necessary to make comparisons work with some of the
hyperbolic functions. Before it worked because they wouldn't evaluate
automatically with `CIF` input, but they should since it's inexact.
I also added a small fix to make the hyperbolic functions work with the
Python `complex` type; they didn't before.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15071#comment:1>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
