#15382: Implementing Macaulay Resultant (sage days 55)
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: haochen_uw | Owner:
Type: task | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.13
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
geometry | Merged in:
Keywords: Macaulay | Reviewers:
Resultant sage-days55 | Work issues:
Authors: Soli Vishkautsan, | Commit:
Hao Chen | 94bcf0ec174e1ba5f697d4bf2e446d8b57874a32
Report Upstream: N/A | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/wishcow/ticket/15382 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by wishcow):
I merged the for loops as much as possible. This produced about a 25%
improvement in performance, not much considering the work. The main
problem is that for now we can't avoid working with actual monomials yet
(I got rid of the bi-directional translation between vectors and monomials
as much as I possibly could). The ring of polynomials is not equipped to
work with vectors instead of monomials, for example in retrieving the
coefficients.
The doctests fail on one test in a very strange way. Please let me know if
you have any idea how to fix it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15382#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
