#5778: [with patch; needs review] Get p-adic doctest coverage to 100% (depends
on
#5105)
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: roed | Owner: roed
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.0
Component: padics | Keywords: doctests
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Comment(by mabshoff):
With #5105 applied all patches apply and I am seeing one issue on
sage.math:
{{{
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/padics/padic_ZZ_pX_element.pyx"
**********************************************************************
File
"/scratch/mabshoff/sage-4.0.alpha0/devel/sage/sage/rings/padics/padic_ZZ_pX_element.pyx",
line 654:
sage: _find_val_aprec_test(Zq(25,names='a'), [15, int(75),
ntl_ZZ(625)])
Expected:
(1, 340282366920938463463374607431768211457, 2)
Got:
(4, 340282366920938463463374607431768211457, 2)
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
}}}
But padic_referee_fixes_2.patch introduces some problem since the latex()
methods use mathbf() instead of ZZ or QQ for example.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5778#comment:47>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
