#15580: Integrate prereq in the new build system
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: distribution | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: R. Andrew Ohana, | Reviewers: R. Andrew Ohana
Jeroen Demeyer | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ohanar/prereq | 43b696f7f53f21e9a08f8a01a3fe0480e1c3a448
Dependencies: #15596 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
Replying to [comment:18 ohanar]:
> Replying to [comment:17 jdemeyer]:
> > I don't think there is a regression to be fixed there. It's true that
`python setup.py` is run indeed because of my patch, but why is that a
problem?
> It requires that all of the sage libraries dependencies to already be
built (otherwise it will bail). Before this branch, you could clone a sage
repository, and without running `make`, you could run (without error)
`sage -sdist`.
OK, I get it. I'm not convinced that the extra complication is justified
for this use-case, but I'll fix it (but hopefully in a simpler way than
your patch).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15580#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.