#10963: More functorial constructions
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: stumpc5
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.1
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: days54 | Merged in:
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Reviewers: Simon King, Frédéric
Report Upstream: N/A | Chapoton
Branch: | Work issues: Detect and fix
public/ticket/10963 | Heisenbugs
Dependencies: #11224, #8327, | Commit:
#10193, #12895, #14516, #14722, | 8eaf51a82c4e2194769db13457979ae601ebbc04
#13589, #14471, #15069, #15094, | Stopgaps:
#11688, #13394, #15150, #15506 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
I'm not completely convinced because you're still getting some calls
twice. It seems that with your changes, the ones that get called twice are
those that are not nested or called via a `cached_method`. In fact, it
seems like those are the same classes that fell into this recursion loop,
so while this might help (and even be a fix for the problem at hand), I
don't think this is the "right" solution.
Perhaps this is a question more for Nicolas, but is there a reason why we
need a separate (cached) function `base_category_class_and_axiom` and not
just including it with the lazy attribute? It seems that it's only called
in the lazy attribute.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10963#comment:259>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
