#16083: MCQD to compute max cliques
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.3
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | a555604888f8f5fd3ab4846a379c8719ae7a7de6
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/mcqd |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> As for this ticket I'd just like to hear the answer to
>
> ''Why you use double variables for the adjacency matrix? Is there any
benefit from allocating a n*n matrix and using a nested for loop to fill
it?''
What do you mean by "double variables" ? Do you mean that I allocate both
"c" (linear size) and "c0" (quadratic size) ?
If so, that is because what MCQD expects is the vector `c`, which points
toward the entries of `c0`.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16083#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
