#16347: Wilson's constructions of OA with 2 truncated groups
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_info
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/ncohen/16347     |  f5069f0dd30bd698489fa047b6fdabd7b8cdaf03
   Dependencies:  #16373             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):

 * status:  needs_review => needs_info


Comment:

 Hi Nathann,

 I did several things at `public/16347`. But I still need to understand
 more the Wilson construction.

 The only construction that does not belong to `orthogonal_array` is the
 product construction (which can be seen as a particular case of wilson
 construction). What do you think if we move it to `orthogonal_array` and
 remove the `who_asked` stuff? It would be much more readable.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16347#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to