#16347: Wilson's constructions of OA with 2 truncated groups
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/16347 | d93a97c5abb48f3f5067c516ca0b133b52146da4
Dependencies: #16373 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
More changes on public if you agree...
Questions:
- I do not understand why you output `n` in
`find_wilson_decomposition_with_one_truncated_group`
- I do not understand why you output `k` in
`find_wilson_decomposition_with_two_truncated_groups`
I would rather output `(r,m,(r1,))` and `(r,m,(r1,r2))`. That way the call
would be uniform in `orthogonal_array`... and you should decide between
`r1,r2` and `u1,u2`.
Vincent
PS: right now I am going to teach ctypes and cython, so I will not look at
it again until tonight.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16347#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
