#16598: Useless new classes and a replacement for _check_pbd
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/ncohen/16598     |  1a5a4b8203a2ad104d617a150e2029dbe3a315b1
   Dependencies:  #16553             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):

 * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Comment:

 > I added a little commit of cleaning (and also replace the deepcopy by
 something more explicit) at `u/vdelecroix/16598`.

 Looks good !

 > The semantic of `copy=True/False` is currently not the same with
 `.blocks()` and `.groups()`. I decided [...]

 Oh, cool ! Actually I thought it was written the way I first wrote
 `.groups` and I thought that it was not the correct way to implement it,
 and so I implemented it this way to follow what I thought was the previou
 choice. I prefer it this way too ! Fixed.

 > In the function `is_group_divisible_design` it is assumed that the
 ground set is `{0, ..., v-1}` (which is just find since it is called with
 the internal data from `GroupDivisibleDesign`). It would be cool to
 specify it in the doc...

 It was specified in the documentation of the mandatory argument `v`, but I
 added another occurrence in the one-line description of the function

 > What is the point of `matrix[i*n+j] != <unsigned short> -1` (in
 `is_group_divisible_design`)?

 Leftover from a previous implementation. Removed !

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16598#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to