#16598: Useless new design classes and a replacement for _check_pbd
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/ncohen/16598     |  494d82657000af8d4361a630035227c6aab6f5de
   Dependencies:  #16553             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 > > Or perhaps I am wrong all the way from the start and nobody cares
 about new functionality or history, so it absolutely does not matter what
 one can or cannot see in changelogs.
 >
 > You are wrong if you believe that you can edit somebody else's ticket
 without asking for their opinion first. This is not a software development
 issue, this is called common sense.

 To be far, Nathann, I think the intent was just to clarify the intent of
 the ticket to those who might not know the whole history of the 'useless
 classes'.  This seems pretty reasonable, since there are hundreds (if not
 thousands) of people who browse Trac.  Humor is a pretty slippery thing -
 all about context :-)

 As to ownership, I would probably disagree that anyone "owns" any given
 ticket, any more than William "owns" Sage, but rather that there is
 significant moral authority vested in knowing the particular code and
 situation very well.  So people shouldn't change titles without reason,
 but if there is a helpful title change (as this one was clearly intending
 to be) we can agree it's in the common good.  Naturally, determining how
 the Sage community governs itself on this issue is for sage-devel - see
 also Steven Weber's "The Success of Open Source" for background reading on
 governance in open-source communities.  Should really be required reading
 for anyone who spends more than a few hours a week on Trac :-)

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16598#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to