#16680: Use a different curve to test an error message in
EllipticCurve_finite_field.cardinality()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  pbruin             |        Owner:
           Type:  task               |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  trivial            |    Milestone:  sage-6.3
      Component:  elliptic curves    |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Peter Bruin        |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/tscrim/elliptic_curve_cardinality-16680|  
e058079e4c09923671b09edf681292d5d82c1903
   Dependencies:  #11474             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by pbruin):

 Replying to [comment:5 tscrim]:
 > Well, we can't get rid of the manual cache because of the
 `cardinality_*` methods which set it when called (IMO, these should be
 private methods and have everything go through `cardinality()` but I don't
 have a stake in this).
 I agree; this would be something for another ticket.
 > I've changed it so that `algorithm` is always ignored if the cardinality
 is known. If someone wants to check against another algorithm, they can
 explicitly call one of the `cardinality_*` methods (which always do the
 computation).
 Your doctest will probably fail if the elliptic curve is garbage-collected
 between the two invocations.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16680#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to