#16331: Game Theory: Build capacity to solve matching games in to Sage.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Matching Games, | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 8b106a26407c51cd7676e9a2c62d488ea2fbe776
public/game_theory/solve_matching_games-16331| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Not yet, but I have not had time to try anything in Sage out the last few
days (travel). I would definitely like to retain prerogative to try
looking at the most recent branch from scratch again, to make sure I
didn't miss anything and it works properly, as well as to look at Travis'
changes. I might be able to get to that closer to the end of the week.
But scanning most of the changes as described in the comments it seems
good, other than the idea to put game theory in the category framework -
that is really very far away from nearly 100% of game theorists' thoughts,
I can assure you, and would be an unneeded step to take at this time.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#comment:79>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
