#16803: Reimplement matrix_integer_dense using FLINT
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  mmasdeu            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  closed
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  linear algebra     |   Resolution:  fixed
       Keywords:  flint, matrix      |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Marc Masdeu        |    Reviewers:  William Stein, Jeroen
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Demeyer
         Branch:                     |  Work issues:
  812a5099731dd5e819ebce0b19ee744de439a6ea|       Commit:
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:92 mmasdeu]:
 > I must say that IMO some of the comments (82 and 90) made above are not
 very constructive.
 [comment:82] was made out of frustration by seeing so many things here
 which are dubious. So okay, that's not constructive.

 However in [comment:90], I noticed a mistake, mentioned it in the comment
 and fixed it in #17090. How is that not constructive?

 > while clearly he himself didn't read the comments at the beginning of
 the ticket (at least those that refer to the convenience of leaving in the
 legacy functions).
 That's true, but after William Stein's comment, I have fixed that back in
 #17090.

 > I feel less inclined to take on the analogous job for
 matrix_rational_dense.
 Please don't. I think it's absolutely good to improve matrices like you
 did here. The fact that I am making so many comments and creating follow-
 up tickets means that I care. I make mistakes, you make mistakes, that's
 normal and that's why have this review process.

 My only complaint (and I still stand behind this) is that this ticket was
 given positive_review too soon. Ideally, those 3 follow-up tickets should
 have been reviewer patches on this ticket.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16803#comment:93>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to