#17108: IncidenceStructure.degree(set={1,2,3})
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/17108 | c34fda620e898708392becbbf8994d9065e29371
Dependencies: #17104 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Yo !
> wouldn't `>1` be more appropriate?
`O_o`
Well it wouldn't work in that case.
> (I note that you used a `ValueError` and not an assert ;-)
`:-P`
> looks like another argument name would be better... `points`? `pts`?
`point` is the current one. I want to make clear that the meaning of the
function changes, so I thought that "set" would do. It cannot be detected
automatically btw.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17108#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
