#17186: LatticePoset: faster is_modular
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/latticeposet__faster_is_modular|
3ca400619ffcac9c7bdb5f045f1b0d656fc32bf3
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: positive_review => needs_work
Comment:
Good ideas from tscrim. I didn't happen to think that in `all(for x... for
y)` I can refer to `x` when making loop on `y`. It is of course easier to
read code that mirrors closely the mathematical definition.
A question: Should I mention same book on all three functions, or only
once?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17186#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
