#17135: Compute diameter using 2sweep, 4sweep and iFUB
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
dcoudert | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.4
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: minor | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: David | 69cb552df487c204e8590a9421e44c044983f8c0
Coudert | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/dcoudert/help |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by dcoudert):
Hello,
thanks for the improvements. It is much better now.
Following your comments, I'm now importing the new method as
{{{GenericGraph.diameter}}}.
I have also removed some {{{int *}}} parameters from iFUB and multi-sweep.
It avoids confusion. Also, since we only need to allocate tables (no need
to initialize them), the extra cost of allocating some tables in 2
different methods is negligible.
David.
PS: git is powerful but not intuitive/easy for non experts.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17135#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
