#17108: IncidenceStructure.degree(set={1,2,3})
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  combinatorial      |   Resolution:
  designs                            |    Merged in:
       Keywords:                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen      |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/ncohen/17108     |  f82b9c41095b538a5da29ba015264c24adddc7c4
   Dependencies:  #17104             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:32 ncohen]:
 > > surely subset is better (and please, please do not name
 variables/parameters set, for Pete's sake...)
 >
 > It is only a problem in your head, not a problem in the code. With two
 lines everything is solved, and the user interface is clearer as a result.
 > {{{
 > +        S = set
 > +        from __builtin__ import set
 > }}}
 >
 > That's all it takes.

 until someone decides to change the code, and adds stuff before `S=`...

 >
 > > And yes, please get rid of `p=` and of `sets_of_size=`.
 >
 > Too bad, I liked the `sets_of_size` feature.
 >
 > > but, really, it is totally wrong to have 3 mutually exclusive keyword
 parameters
 >
 > We did almost the same in `PermutationGroup.orbit`. Instead of different
 flags we had a `action='OnPoints',action='OnSets', ...`. I would not mind
 having `IncidenceStructure.degree(p,type='set')` or `type='point'` but you
 would not like it.

 The only reason it is done so in `PermutationGroup.orbit`is that `action`
 can be user-defined (at least in the underlying GAP code).

 >
 > > This is not what the keyword parameters are for, they are not poor man
 substitutes of function names. No, they are not...
 >
 > You seem really bothered by what I do with those parameters. Are you
 worried that users may find it confusing ?

 As a reviewer, I find it totally wrong design. Many users would be
 confused, too.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17108#comment:34>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to