#17108: IncidenceStructure.degree(set={1,2,3})
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: u/ncohen/17108 | f82b9c41095b538a5da29ba015264c24adddc7c4
Dependencies: #17104 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
but, really, it is totally wrong to have 3 **mutually exclusive** keyword
parameters A, B, C `f(A=bla)`, `f(B=fook)`, `f(C=fok)` and, surely
enough, code in `f` to parse all this crap, so that people do not
mistakenly use them together,
instead of `fA(bla)`, `fB(fook)`, `fC(fok)`.
This is not what the keyword parameters are for, they are not poor man
substitutes of function names. No, they are not...
No, really. Take a deep breath an think about it for 3 minutes...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17108#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
