#16333: Game Theory: build capacity to use gambit to solve Normal Form Games.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Normal Form Games | Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer, Karl-
Authors: Vincent Knight, | Dieter Crisman
James Campbell | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | c9f036afd06cb3d9949177d70e235c359db4f70c
u/vinceknight/gambit_integration | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #16466 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Just had to check the look of the docs again. In addition to getting the
{{{IPython}}} thing right (there are two total in the gambit docs and one
in the normal form game file), I notice that in the gambit docs file
> Here is how to use the !ExternalEnumPureSolver
has !ExternalEnumPureSolver in single backticks, but this makes it look
like a math variable instead of code. I recommend double backticks or
nothing; similarly for
> If one really wants to use gambit directly in Sage (without using the
!NormalFormGame class as a wrapper)
Not sure why I didn't mention those before, I did see them.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16333#comment:74>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
