#16453: Cythonize quiver paths
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Simon King | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/16453 | e03b66156f5b5212bfeffc937887ae5c29a1a6ca
Dependencies: #15820 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:83 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:81 SimonKing]:
> > Or are you saying I ''should'' implement those functions on the level
of `biseq_t`?
> I never noticed that these functions aren't defined for `biseq_t`, but
the answer is obviously: yes, they should be implemented on the level of
`biseq_t` (in a different ticket).
... which would become a dependency for this ticket, right?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16453#comment:85>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
