#17898: Removal of wrong stopgap
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: stopgap, | Merged in:
partitions | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw,
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw, | Anne Schilling
Anne Schilling | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | d3de7cf960cb38e03d69d3e4b8951bcc9ddd830a
public/combinat/fix_bad_stopgap-17898| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):
* status: needs_work => positive_review
Comment:
@ncohen You also wouldn't use a lemma if you don't satisfy its hypotheses,
and if your situation doesn't, then it doesn't make the lemma wrong. It is
also our responsibility to display warnings/errors when it makes sense.
@jdemeyer "I'm too lazy to figure out a good way to display a warning" is
how we got into this situation.
@vbraun There's a sign along the path telling you where the shards are way
off the trail, but I don't think we want a sign saying you don't want to
walk in the forest. I agree this should be more visible for users at the
frontend (and I forgot this class was in the global namespace), but I
don't agree with getting angry calls from debt collectors well before it
comes due.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17898#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
