#17898: Removal of wrong stopgap
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  stopgap,           |    Merged in:
  partitions                         |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw,
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw,  |  Anne Schilling
  Anne Schilling                     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  2f7a90d8419ca8d2202b3cb31290e58194f666e3
  public/combinat/fix_bad_stopgap-17898|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:21 tscrim]:
 > So yet again, I had to spend my time and energy fixing this ridiculous
 stopgap in order for Sage not to look like it doesn't even work for simple
 and common combinatorial objects. I am tired of being forced into these
 things because someone wants to swing a hatchet around on a soapbox.
 "I'm too lazy to fix this bug" is not a valid excuse for not fixing a bug.
 Sage development is not just about adding new features, sometimes you also
 need to maintain and improve the quality of existing code.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17898#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to