#17898: Removal of wrong stopgap
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: stopgap, | Merged in:
partitions | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw,
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw, | Anne Schilling
Anne Schilling | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 2f7a90d8419ca8d2202b3cb31290e58194f666e3
public/combinat/fix_bad_stopgap-17898| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:21 tscrim]:
> So yet again, I had to spend my time and energy fixing this ridiculous
stopgap in order for Sage not to look like it doesn't even work for simple
and common combinatorial objects. I am tired of being forced into these
things because someone wants to swing a hatchet around on a soapbox.
"I'm too lazy to fix this bug" is not a valid excuse for not fixing a bug.
Sage development is not just about adding new features, sometimes you also
need to maintain and improve the quality of existing code.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17898#comment:29>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.