#18078: CMake optional package
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: isuruf | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: packages: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Isuru Fernando | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 3aae9bf7905d0cb5ec63eaceef8ee9f590c87463
u/isuruf/cmake_optional_package | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by fbissey):
Replying to [comment:21 jdemeyer]:
> @fbissey: and the problem is that we really need GCC for Sage, because
we need a Fortran compiler and `clang` doesn't (yet) support Fortran.
I know. Although I have been trying very hard to think about fortran code
in sage apart from lapack. I think the only fortran bits where you need a
fortran compiler are in atlas, scipy and unfortunately for OS X: R.
We use the accelerate framework instead of Atlas on OS X, one less fortran
thing.
A fortran compiler is needed while compiling scipy :( lots of fortran code
in there.
R is more pernicious, you need a fortran compiler on OS X because there is
a bug preventing us to use accelerate.
flang is just a dot on the horizon so far. At least they say they started
work on it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18078#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
