#19867: Add Motzkin decomposition for convex cones
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mjo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Michael Orlitzky | Reviewers: Andrey Novoseltsev
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mjo/ticket/19867 | 52d5aae18aa66c6a238e745664403366d08ff36f
Dependencies: 19831 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by novoselt):
* reviewer: => Andrey Novoseltsev
Comment:
I don't think "cone's" is correct English, at least it sounds weird.
The way you set it up, it is NOT the direct sum, but Minkowski sum.
If Motzkin decomposition is not standard, why is it called like this here?
I mean it would be nice to elaborate that it is not just your invention
;-)
I would put extra check to handle corner cases so that the strict
component of a strictly convex cone `is` this cone in Python sense, same
with subspaces.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19867#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
