#19867: Add Motzkin decomposition for convex cones
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mjo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-7.0
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Michael Orlitzky | Reviewers: Andrey Novoseltsev
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mjo/ticket/19867 | 303093b3f737d9f0a578d59eaa0cc98414d1e003
Dependencies: 19831 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mjo):
Replying to [comment:5 vbraun]:
> maybe just .decomposition()?
That makes it sound more important than it is... I can think of a few
other decompositions with equal (or more) claim to the same name. What if
we add one of those later?
Some other candidates would be `linear_subspace_decomposition`,
`subspace_decomposition`, or `strictly_convex_decomposition`. If we're
willing to use the word "pointed" to mean "strictly convex," then there's
also `pointed_decomposition` and `pointed_subspace_decomposition`. That
last one is probably the most descriptive of them all, but having a method
named `strictly_convex_subspace_decomposition` would be getting a bit
ridiculous lengthwise.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19867#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
