#19259: subrings of the symbolic ring
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Daniel Krenn | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/behackl/symbolics/symbolic- | c4a0e226b7fa34959d990be3bb768d270fd7f9a5
subring | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dkrenn):
Replying to [comment:19 cheuberg]:
> Replying to [comment:18 behackl]:
> >> In principle, this would be a `positive_review` from my side,
however, I'd like to rewrite your code some more such that subrings of
subrings can be constructed as well. The easiest way to do so (probably),
is to let the functors do everything.
>
> The question is whether to postpone the rewriting to a follow-up ticket
(i.e., does your planned rewriting affect the interface or is it just
internal rewriting which will then allow new things to be done?) This also
in view of several tickets depending on this ticket here.
+1 for postpone to follow-up ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19259#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
