#7532: "return NotImplementedError" in ring.pyx
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  was              |         Owner:  cremona                 
     Type:  defect           |        Status:  positive_review         
 Priority:  major            |     Milestone:  sage-4.3.1              
Component:  elliptic curves  |    Resolution:  fixed                   
 Keywords:                   |        Author:  John Cremona            
 Upstream:  N/A              |      Reviewer:  Tim Dumol, John Palmieri
   Merged:                   |   Work_issues:                          
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):

  * status:  needs_review => positive_review
  * reviewer:  Tim Dumol => Tim Dumol, John Palmieri
  * author:  John Palmieri => John Cremona


Old description:

> {{{
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:26 PM, John H Palmieri <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > In ring.pyx, there is code like this:
> >
> >        if proof:
> >            return NotImplementedError
> >        else:
> >            return False
> >
> > I would think that the second line should say "raise
> > NotImplementedError".  (Changing it makes some doctests fail,
> > though.)  Is there a good reason for doing "return
> > NotImplementedError"?
>
> That's *definitely* a bug.   No question about it.
> }}}

New description:

 {{{
 On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:26 PM, John H Palmieri <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 > In ring.pyx, there is code like this:
 >
 >        if proof:
 >            return NotImplementedError
 >        else:
 >            return False
 >
 > I would think that the second line should say "raise
 > NotImplementedError".  (Changing it makes some doctests fail,
 > though.)  Is there a good reason for doing "return
 > NotImplementedError"?

 That's *definitely* a bug.   No question about it.
 }}}

 Addendum: apply the patches {{{trac_7532.patch}}} and
 {{{trac_7532-rings.patch}}}.  Depends on #7535.

--

Comment:

 Looks good, all tests pass.  Thanks for the fix, John.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7532#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.


Reply via email to