#8986: Add support for convex rational polyhedral cones
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  novoselt            |       Owner:  mhampton  
       Type:  enhancement         |      Status:  needs_work
   Priority:  major               |   Milestone:  sage-4.4.3
  Component:  geometry            |    Keywords:            
     Author:  Andrey Novoseltsev  |    Upstream:  N/A       
   Reviewer:                      |      Merged:            
Work_issues:                      |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by novoselt):

 * cc: vbraun (added)


Old description:

> This patch is a part of the following series adding support for
> cones/fans and toric varieties to Sage:
>
> Prerequisites:
>
> #8675 - Remove {{{AmbientSpace._constructor}}} and fix consequences
>
> #8682 - Improve {{{AlgebraicScheme_subscheme.__init__}}} and
> {{{AmbientSpace._validate}}}
>
> #8694 - Improve schemes printing and !LaTeXing
>
> #8934 - Trivial bug in computing faces of non-full-dimensional lattice
> polytopes
>
> #8936 - Expose facet inequalities for lattice polytopes
>
> #8941 - {{{_latex_}}} and {{{origin}}} for lattice polytopes
>
> Main patches adding new modules:
>
> #8986 - Add support for convex rational polyhedral cones
>
> #8987 - Add support for rational polyhedral fans
>
> #8988 - Add support for toric varieties
>
> #8989 - Add support for Fano toric varieties
>
> Everything was tested on sage.math using sage-4.4.2.rc0.
>
> Known issues:
>
> - Applying patch for toric varieties leads to a doctest error in
> {{{sage.symbolic.random_tests}}}, which I don't quite understand,
> especially since this patch just adds a new module! The documentation of
> the failing function says "This function will often raise an error
> because it tries to create an erroneous expression." I am not sure if
> this means that its doctest may cause these errors.
>
> - The last two patches show a doctest coverage error about
> {{{TestSuite}}}. This doctest does not work yet for other schemes and
> therefore should not be expected to work for these derived classes (and
> indeed - it does not work). According to
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-
> devel/browse_thread/thread/a42ace80078373b4
> this should not be an obstacle to include these patches.

New description:

 This patch is a part of the following series adding support for cones/fans
 and toric varieties to Sage:

 Prerequisites:

 #8675 - Remove {{{AmbientSpace._constructor}}} and fix consequences

 #8682 - Improve {{{AlgebraicScheme_subscheme.__init__}}} and
 {{{AmbientSpace._validate}}}

 #8694 - Improve schemes printing and !LaTeXing

 #8934 - Trivial bug in computing faces of non-full-dimensional lattice
 polytopes

 #8936 - Expose facet inequalities for lattice polytopes

 #8941 - {{{_latex_}}} and {{{origin}}} for lattice polytopes

 Main patches adding new modules:

 #9062 - Add support for toric lattices

 #8986 - Add support for convex rational polyhedral cones

 #8987 - Add support for rational polyhedral fans

 #8988 - Add support for toric varieties

 #8989 - Add support for Fano toric varieties

 Everything was tested on sage.math using sage-4.4.2.rc0.

--

Comment:

 New version of the patch depends on #9062 and actually makes some
 improvements to toric lattices. Switch of caching technique to allow
 efficient extension of class hierarchy is still pending.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8986#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to